🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's security policy document presents a misguided assessment of the European Union. The document asserts that unrestrained immigration and so-called "woke" agendas pose an grave threat to European civilization. However, this argument rests on a serious misreading of the reality. The true challenge confronting the EU is not societal but technological and economic backwardness.

The Stark Economic Divide Between Europe and the US

The data reveal a stark picture. From 2008 and 2023, American economic output grew by eighty-seven percent, while a mere thirteen and a half percent growth for the European Union. During this period, European income per person dropped from over three-quarters to just half of the US level. Remarkably, even Mississippi now has a greater average income than several leading EU nations like Italy and France.

Today, roughly 50% of the world’s 50 largest technology firms are US-based, while only four are European.

The Technological Deficit: The Core Question

This widening economic gap is driven by stronger productivity growth in the United States, fueled by technological innovation and higher total factor productivity. The scene of world technology leadership is overwhelmingly US-centric. In the last fifty years, 241 US firms have scaled into enterprises valued at more than ten billion dollars, versus just 14 in Europe.

This gap raises a pressing question: As the competition for tomorrow's sectors like AI, semiconductors, and quantum computing, what is the EU stand? Most analysts concede it is essentially a two-horse race involving the US and China, with Europe entering at a significant disadvantage.

Underlying Factors of the Continent's Technological Lag

Several major factors account for this innovation chasm.

• Venture Capital: The US boasts a much more robust and agile network for financing new ventures. Europe has yet to establish a true capital markets union, which limits the scale of emerging companies.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Excessive and fragmented rules hinder European business. A US startup can introduce a service under one regulatory framework to access a consumer base of over 330 million. The European Union, despite a larger population, is divided among 27 separate regimes, creating significant market obstacles.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on risk-taking vary greatly. In parts of Europe, a startup's collapse was once met with stigma, whereas in the United States, it is often considered a valuable lesson.
• Military Investment: The United States enjoys a tightly woven academic-military-industrial complex. Europe's long-term lack of spending in military capabilities has weakened its ability in pioneering research.

The Road Ahead: Grounds for Cautious Optimism

In spite of these challenges, one can find reasons for optimism. Policymakers are growing more conscious of the severe threat and have started to advance substantial change. Key analyses on EU competitiveness and the internal market highlight the necessity of sweeping changes.

Given appropriate policies and rule changes, these assets could support much higher levels of commercial innovation.

The continent still possesses considerable advantages: skilled human capital, top-tier education systems, and premier research institutions. Alongside a large internal market and high savings rates, these foundations could unleash a surge of investment and entrepreneurship.

Importantly, even if the EU does not take the lead in developing cutting-edge technologies, it can still significantly increase productivity by adopting and adapting advancements from elsewhere.

A Critical Juncture

Europe now faces a critical moment. As the saying goes, decline often happens "slowly, then all at once". So far, the continent's technological decline has been steady. But, if it fails to take bold steps to address its deep-seated problems, today's gradual weakening could give way to a sudden and irreversible loss of world influence.